Indices of pulmonary oxygenation in pathological lung states: An investigation using high-fidelity, computational modelling

Abstract

Background: Existing indices of pulmonary oxygenation vary misleadingly with external factors such as inspired oxygen fraction (Fio2), arterial carbon dioxide tension (Paco2), and haemoglobin (Hb). Previous work suggested that some indices may be acceptably useful in particular scenarios such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or where Fi o2>60%. However, it is not possible to identify such scenarios in most clinical contexts; therefore we aimed to examine the induced variability of existing indices in a population of patients with a variety of lung defects. Methods: We configured nine virtual patients within the Nottingham Physiology Simulator, each with a unique pulmonary configuration but identical arterial blood gases at Fio2 30%, Paco2 6.0 kPa and Hb 8.0 g dl-1. Factors (Fio2, Pco2, Hb) were varied independently and indices of oxygenation including calculated venous admixture (Qs/Qt), arterial oxygen tension (Pao2/Fio2), arterio-alveolar gas tension gradient (Pa-ao2), and respiratory index (Pa-ao2/Pao2) were recorded. Results: All indices varied with Fio2, with greatest variation with lung defects having least true (absolute) shunt. Calculated Qs/Qt resisted induced variation best of all the indices, but varied by 30% of its mean value during Fio2 variation. Pao2/Fio2 varied greatly, especially during variation in Fio2 (up to 74% of its average value), and most markedly in defects with little true (absolute) shunt. Paco2 and Hb variation caused small, consistent changes in all indices that were similar between lung-states. Conclusions: No existing index of oxygenation adequately describes the severity of gas exchange defect. Existing indices of oxygenation vary with disease severity, disease type, and external factors such as Fio2. A novel and robust index is needed. © The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Board of Directors of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.