Evaluation of the Coulter Counter® model S-Plus IV

52Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evaluation of linearity, carry-over, precision, and accuracy of a Coulter Counter model S-Plus IV prototype showed that they meet the manufacturer's specifications. The instrument also was compared with an earlier model. Correlations of the lymphocyte and granulocyte values in the three-part differential count with manual eye-count and a Technicon® Hemalog D90 results were very close to the correlation of eye-count to Hemalog D90 results. The percentage of mononuclear cells showed acceptable correlation to the manual eye-count when monocytes were combined with blasts, eosinophils, and basophils. The medical effectiveness of the three-part differential was determined by comparison with manual eye-counts in 1,084 samples. The false positive and false negative values were 7.38% and 7.84%, respectively. The instrument has acceptable limits of operation. When combined with analysis of histograms by trained personnel, the three-part differential count is capable of screening for abnormalities that require further analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cox, C. J., Habermann, T. M., Payne, B. A., Klee, G. G., & Pierre, R. V. (1985). Evaluation of the Coulter Counter® model S-Plus IV. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 84(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/84.3.297

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free