Exploring real-time PCR techniques for diagnosing leishmaniasis: key insights from a systematic review

8Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Real-time PCR (qPCR) has emerged as a promising alternative to be used in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis. However, a consensus on the standardized approach for this purpose is yet to be established. This systematic review aims to highlight relevant aspects for the development of possible consensus protocols. The study included publications from January 2011 to July 2023 using different databases. Studies focusing on qPCR standardization for the diagnosis of leishmaniasis were included. The collected data encompassed study group details, geographical locations, sample types and quantities, molecular targets, and qPCR methodologies, which were subsequently pooled and analyzed. Forty-three studies conducted in diverse regions of the world were included. The majority were visceral leishmaniasis, followed by cutaneous leishmaniasis and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Overall, invasive samples demonstrated higher sensitivity (> 90%) compared to non-invasive samples (< 90%), but both exhibited high specificity (> 85%). Furthermore, the kDNA minicircle was identified as the most promising molecular target, with a discreet preference for the use of TaqMan probes over SYBR Green. Various qPCR approaches have exhibited promising results in the diagnosis of leishmaniasis. However, further studies exploring non-invasive sampling techniques in conjunction with appropriate molecular targets are essential to establish efficient and reliable diagnostic techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rihs, J. B., Vilela, M. T., dos Santos, J. S. C., Caldas, S., Leite, R. S., & Mol, M. P. G. (2025, May 1). Exploring real-time PCR techniques for diagnosing leishmaniasis: key insights from a systematic review. Parasitology Research. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-025-08503-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free