Why Track 2 MAiD is Discriminatory

1Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper argues that Canada’s Track 2 Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) regime is discriminatory against people with disabilities, and has a disproportionate impact on women with disabilities. It is important to expose critical gaps in pro-MAiD advocacy, which obscures how systemic marginalization shapes access to assisted death. Premised on a medical model of disability which exceptionalizes disability-related suffering as uniquely intolerable, Track 2 MAiD poses heightened risks for those already disadvantaged by structural inequalities. By framing death as a medical treatment, the law reinforces ableist assumptions that portray people with disabilities as better off dead instead of providing access to essential supports. These social inequalities are heightened for disabled women who experience alarming rates of male violence, the intersection of medical ableism and sexism, as well as the assumption that women should be caregivers and not those needing care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Granta, I. (2025). Why Track 2 MAiD is Discriminatory. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 8(4), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.7202/1121334ar

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free