A paradigm for ecological risk assessment

33Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The 1983 National Academy of Sciences paradigm for conducting human health risk assessment is considered with respect to ecological risk assessment. This four-step paradigm fails to capture key intrinsic differences between the two types of analysis, specifically: identity of risk targets and receptors; identity of the appropriate level of ecological organization at which the risk is expressed; variability of endpoint with respect to risk receptor; and the existence of risk cascades through ecological feedback loops. We propose an alternative paradigm that includes a preliminary step, receptor identification, in which chemical partitioning is combined with a conceptual model of the ecosystem to identify appropriate risk targets. In addition, we propose formal inclusion of endpoint identification and explicit consideration of risk cascades in a relationship assessment in which interactive feedback loops are considered in an iterative process. The proposed paradigm preserves the steps of hazard identification, exposure assessment, dose-response assessment (renamed response assessment) and risk characterization, although specific modifications are recommended. © 1993 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lipton, J., Galbraith, H., Burger, J., & Wartenberg, D. (1993). A paradigm for ecological risk assessment. Environmental Management, 17(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393789

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free