The relationship between widespread changes in gravity and cerebral blood flow

21Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated the dose–effect relationship between wide changes in gravity from 0 to 2.0 Gz (Δ0.5 Gz) and cerebral blood flow (CBF), to test our hypothesis that CBF has a linear relationship with levels of gravity. Subjects and methods: Ten healthy seated men were exposed to 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 Gz for 21 min, by using a tilt chair and a short-arm human centrifuge. Steady-state CBF velocity (CBFV) in the middle cerebral artery by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the heart level (MAPHeart), heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output and respiratory conditions were obtained for the last 6 min at each gravity level. Then, MAP in the middle cerebral artery (MAPMCA), reflecting cerebral perfusion pressure, was estimated. Results: Steady-state CBFV decreased stepwise from 0.5 to 2.0 Gz. Steady-state heart rate, stroke volume, estimated MAPMCA and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (ETCO2) also changed stepwise from hypogravity to hypergravity. On the other hand, steady-state MAPHeart and cardiac output did not change significantly. Steady-state CBFV positively and linearly correlated with estimated MAPMCA and ETCO2 in most subjects. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated stepwise gravity-induced changes in steady-state CBFV from 0.5 to 2.0 Gz despite unchanged steady-state MAPHeart. The combined effects of reduced MAPMCA and ETCO2 likely led to stepwise decreases in CBFV. We caution that a mild increase in gravity from 0 to 2.0 Gz reduces CBF, even if arterial blood pressure at the heart level is maintained.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ogawa, Y., Yanagida, R., Ueda, K., Aoki, K., & Iwasaki, K. ichi. (2016). The relationship between widespread changes in gravity and cerebral blood flow. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 21(4), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-016-0513-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free