Fibroepithelioma of Pinkus Revisited

26Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Fibroepithelioma of Pinkus (FeP) is considered a variant of basal cell carcinoma (BCC); however, in the past 20 years, some researchers have argued for its classification as a trichoblastoma. Recently, use of a new immunostaining marker and further dermoscopic characterization of FeP have advanced the debate about its proper classification. Purpose: A review of the evidence for and against classification of FeP as BCC or trichoblastoma is presented. Methods: Using PubMed, the term FeP was searched and relevant citations were assessed. Additional relevant articles were identified from references of key papers. Results: FeP shares characteristics of both trichoblastoma and BCC. Conclusion: Derived from the same cell type, BCC and trichoblastoma may be best considered as representing opposite ends of a spectrum of differentiation, with FeP deserving an intermediate classification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haddock, E. S., & Cohen, P. R. (2016, September 1). Fibroepithelioma of Pinkus Revisited. Dermatology and Therapy. Springer Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-016-0123-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free