How to measure the accessibility maturity of organizations—A survey on accessibility maturity models for higher education

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Maturity models are increasingly used to advance the processes of organizations, including Higher Education Institutions. In this paper, we review existing maturity models to analyze and optimize the accessibility of organizations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature research in the databases Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, BASE, ACM, and Google Scholar, resulting in 13 different maturity models. An additional web search on maturity models for accessibility found another 12 maturity models that we added to the results. Finally, we analyzed the 25 maturity models in more detail, specifically the indicators that each maturity model uses to measure accessibility. The most frequent indicators were “responsibility”, “competences & training”, and “monitoring”, with differences in the frequencies when separated by target group. Out of the 25 maturity models found, only 6 focused on Higher Education Institutions. None of the existing maturity models focuses on teaching and learning of accessibility explicitly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Auer, N., Kalemba, S., Stormer, C., Boehm, A. K., Cetin, H., Gutjahr, A., … Zimmermann, G. (2023). How to measure the accessibility maturity of organizations—A survey on accessibility maturity models for higher education. Frontiers in Computer Science. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1134320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free