MicroRNA array normalization: An evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark

14Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

MicroRNA arrays possess a number of unique data features that challenge the assumption key to many normalization methods. We assessed the performance of existing normalization methods using two microRNA array datasets derived from the same set of tumor samples: one dataset was generated using a blocked randomization design when assigning arrays to samples and hence was free of confounding array effects; the second dataset was generated without blocking or randomization and exhibited array effects. The randomized dataset was assessed for differential expression between two tumor groups and treated as the benchmark. The non-randomized dataset was assessed for differential expression after normalization and compared against the benchmark. Normalization improved the true positive rate significantly in the non-randomized data but still possessed a false discovery rate as high as 50%. Adding a batch adjustment step before normalization further reduced the number of false positive markers while maintaining a similar number of true positive markers, which resulted in a false discovery rate of 32% to 48%, depending on the specific normalization method. We concluded the paper with some insights on possible causes of false discoveries to shed light on how to improve normalization for microRNA arrays. © 2014 Qin, Zhou.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qin, L. X., & Zhou, Q. (2014). MicroRNA array normalization: An evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark. PLoS ONE, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098879

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free