Comparison of Methods for Estimation of Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms and Enterococci in Retail Ground Beef

  • Pierson C
  • Emswiler B
  • Kotula A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Seven recommended methods for estimation of coliforms, three for fecal coliforms and four for enterococci were tested on 30 retail ground beef samples. Lauryl sulfate tryptose broth gave higher coliform counts than did MacConkey's broth or brilliant green lactose bile broth 2% in 3-tube Most Probable Number (MPN) methods. With all MPN broths, coliforms counts were significantly (P ⩽0.05) higher after 48 than after 24 h of incubation. Presumptive coliform counts were higher with surface-overlay plating on violet red bile agar than with pour plating on the same agar or with the MPN broths. However, presence of Escherichia coli Type I was not confirmed as often from the agar medium as the broths. For estimation of fecal coliforms, counts did not differ significantly (P ⩽0.05) between EC broth (45.5 C) and brilliant green lactose bile broth 2% (44 C). Enterococci counts varied significantly (P ⩽0.05) among the four methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pierson, C. J., Emswiler, B. S., & Kotula, A. W. (1978). Comparison of Methods for Estimation of Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms and Enterococci in Retail Ground Beef. Journal of Food Protection, 41(4), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-41.4.263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free