Abstract
The most commonly used method for dose finding, the 3 þ 3, has poor performance. New adaptive designs are more efficient. Nevertheless, they have reached a maximum performance level, and further improvement requires either larger sample sizes or outcomes measures richer than the simplistic severe toxicity measured at cycle 1.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Paoletti, X., Drubay, D., & Collette, L. (2017). Dose-finding methods: Moving away from the 3 + 3 to include richer outcomes. Clinical Cancer Research, 23(15), 3977–3979. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1306
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free