Dose-finding methods: Moving away from the 3 + 3 to include richer outcomes

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The most commonly used method for dose finding, the 3 þ 3, has poor performance. New adaptive designs are more efficient. Nevertheless, they have reached a maximum performance level, and further improvement requires either larger sample sizes or outcomes measures richer than the simplistic severe toxicity measured at cycle 1.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paoletti, X., Drubay, D., & Collette, L. (2017). Dose-finding methods: Moving away from the 3 + 3 to include richer outcomes. Clinical Cancer Research, 23(15), 3977–3979. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free