The most commonly used method for dose finding, the 3 þ 3, has poor performance. New adaptive designs are more efficient. Nevertheless, they have reached a maximum performance level, and further improvement requires either larger sample sizes or outcomes measures richer than the simplistic severe toxicity measured at cycle 1.
CITATION STYLE
Paoletti, X., Drubay, D., & Collette, L. (2017). Dose-finding methods: Moving away from the 3 + 3 to include richer outcomes. Clinical Cancer Research, 23(15), 3977–3979. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1306
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.