Deaf studies: A critique of the predominant U.S. theoretical direction

27Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The focus and concerns establishing Deaf Studies in the 1970s have rigidified into a reactive stance toward changing historical conditions and the variety of deaf lives today. This critique analyzes the theoretical foundation of this stance: a tendency to downplay established research in the field of Deaf Studies and linguistics, the employment of outdated examples of discrimination, an uncritical acceptance of Derrida's phonocentrism, flawed uses of Saussure's linguistic theory, and reliance on the limiting metaphor of colonialism. The purpose of the critique ultimately is to point Deaf Studies in a new direction. Issues with conceptualizing an expanded Deaf Studies are the focus of a companion article (this issue), "Inclusive Deaf Studies: Barriers and Pathways." © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Myers, S. S., & Fernandes, J. K. (2009). Deaf studies: A critique of the predominant U.S. theoretical direction. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enp017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free