Shared sanitation: To include or to exclude?

23Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Just over 600 million people used shared sanitation in 2015, but this form of sanitation is not considered 'improved sanitation' or, in the current terminology, 'basic sanitation' by WHO/UNICEF, principally because they are typically unhygienic. Recent research has shown that neighbour-shared toilets perform much better than large communal toilets. The successful development of community-designed, built and managed sanitation-and-water blocks in very poor urban areas in India should be adapted and adopted throughout urban slums in developing countries, with a caretaker employed to keep the facilities clean. Such shared sanitation should be classified as 'basic', sometimes as 'safely-managed', sanitation, so contributing to the achievement of the sanitation target of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mara, D. (2016). Shared sanitation: To include or to exclude? Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 110(5), 265–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trw029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free