Abstract
Objectives: To assess dental implant placement accuracy with a dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (dCAIS) system and a freehand approach. Secondarily, to compare the patients' perception and quality of life (QoL) with the two approaches. Methods: A double-arm randomized clinical trial was conducted. Consecutive partially edentulous patients were randomly allocated to the dCAIS or standard freehand approach groups. Implant placement accuracy was evaluated by overlapping the preoperative and postoperative Cone Beam Computer Tomographs (CBCT) and recording linear deviations at the implant apex and platform (in mm) and angular deviations (in degrees). Questionnaires recorded self-reported satisfaction, pain and QoL during surgery and postoperatively. Results: Thirty patients (22 implants) were enrolled in each group. One patient was lost to follow-up. A significant difference (p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jorba-García, A., Bara-Casaus, J. J., Camps-Font, O., Sánchez-Garcés, M. Á., Figueiredo, R., & Valmaseda-Castellón, E. (2023). Accuracy of dental implant placement with or without the use of a dynamic navigation assisted system: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(5), 438–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14050
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.