The symbolic forms of indonesian language teaching’s discourse at iain palopo: A critical discourse analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research aims at revealing the functions of symbolic forms of Indonesian language teaching (PBI). The method used is qualitative descriptive with data source in the form of conversations between lecturer and students who produce words, phrases, and sentences obtained by recorder instrument (handycam) and interview guidelines. The data is analyzed using data reduction, data display, and verification technique. The results show that the symbolic forms used in PBI’s discourse reveals the idea of characteristics concerning motivation, strengthening, competence, sharpening, and awareness. In line with that, the functions of the symbolic forms include (1) statements with "challenging" characteristic and its development; (2) direction, guidance, and advice; (3) praise; (4) threat (fear); (5) question and correction; (6) inadequacy and weakness; (7) sanction (discipline); (8) counseling and training service; (9) instruction or command; (10) honesty; and (11) request or demand.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sukirman, Jufri, Tahmir, S., & Mahmudah. (2019). The symbolic forms of indonesian language teaching’s discourse at iain palopo: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1003.29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free