Functional and Mechanistic Explanation for the Unique Clinical Success of the Glucokinase Activator Dorzagliatin in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Glucokinase (GK) activators (GKAs) are a long-sought therapeuticmodality for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, GKAs have failed in clinical trials, with the recent exception of dorzagliatin (HuaMedicine). A comprehensive approach using human islet perifusions, enzyme kinetics, X-ray crystallography, andmodeling studies was applied to compare the effects of dorzagliatin with those of the unsuccessful GKA MK-0941 (Merck Pharmaceuticals), which is well characterized both clinically and mechanistically. Dorzagliatin improved glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in a dose- and glucose-dependent manner, in contrast to MK-0941, which induced maximal insulin secretion at low doses and glucose concentrations. To understand these functional differences, the atomic resolution structure of the dorzagliatin-GK complex was determined and compared with the GK–MK-0941 structure.MK-0941 bound to a pocket accessible in both open and closed conformations; had a strong interaction with Y214, the mutation of which produces the most clinically severe activating mutation; and produced a high energy barrier for the opento- closed transition. In contrast, dorzagliatin only bound favorably to the closed form of GK, interacting primarily with R63 and causing a low energy barrier for the opento- closed transition. This provides the molecular rationale for the clinical success of dorzagliatin, which can guide the future development of next-generation allosteric activators of GK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roman, J., Yuan, Y., Xu, Y., Zhu, Q., Wu, S., Zhao, F., … Doliba, N. M. (2025). Functional and Mechanistic Explanation for the Unique Clinical Success of the Glucokinase Activator Dorzagliatin in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes, 74(8), 1374–1384. https://doi.org/10.2337/db25-0066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free