Comparing effectiveness of high-fidelity human patient simulation vs case-based learning in pharmacy education

33Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether human patient simulation (HPS) is superior to case-based learning (CBL) in teaching diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and thyroid storm (TS) to pharmacy students. Design. In this cross-over, open-label, single center, randomized control trial, final-year undergraduate pharmacy students enrolled in an applied therapeutics course were randomized to HPS or CBL groups. Pretest, posttest, knowledge retention tests, and satisfaction survey were administered to students. Assessment. One hundred seventy-four students participated in this study. The effect sizes attributable to HPS were larger than CBL in both cases. HPS groups performed significantly better in posttest and knowledge retention test compared to CBL groups pertaining to TS case (p,0.05). Students expressed high levels of satisfaction with HPS sessions. Conclusion. HPS was superior to CBL in teaching DKA and TS to final-year undergraduate pharmacy students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chin, K. L., Yap, Y. L., Lee, W. L., & Soh, Y. C. (2014). Comparing effectiveness of high-fidelity human patient simulation vs case-based learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(8). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe788153

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free