Autonomous agencies and perceptions of stakeholder influence in parliamentary democracies

33Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This article examines the following question: How do independent agencies within parliamentary democracies perceive the influence of various political principals and societal stakeholders in their environment on their strategic and policy decisions? This question is examined through an extension of the theory and methodology of Waterman, Rouse, and Wright for 213 Dutch agencies. We find that agencies perceive their parent minister as their primary principals. This implies that the relationship between politicians and agencies in the Netherlands fit the model of dyadic principal agency relationship. By contrast, we find no support for the existence of horizontal network type of relationships between agencies and governmental and nongovernmental stakeholders in their environment. We also find, remarkably, that agency officials in the Netherlands apply the same categories for distinguishing between their principals as the US agency officials in the study of Waterman, Rouse, and Wright. © The Author 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yesilkagit, K., & Van Thiel, S. (2012). Autonomous agencies and perceptions of stakeholder influence in parliamentary democracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free