Quality of Life Ratings and Proxy Bias in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Two Sides to the Story?

8Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A valid measure of quality of life is important for clinical goal setting and for evaluating interventions. In the amnestic dementias, proxy-raters (e.g. friends, families, clinicians) typically rate quality of life lower than the self-ratings given by the person with dementia – a proxy bias. This study investigated whether the same proxy bias occurs in Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA), a language-led dementia. Quality of life was measured in 18 individuals with PPA using self-ratings, and proxy-ratings by their main communication partner, using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s Disease Scale. There was no strong evidence for proxy bias at a group level, with no consistent pattern across dyads, where proxy- and self-ratings did not show good levels of agreement. We suggest that self-ratings and proxy-ratings of quality of life in PPA are not interchangeable. Higher-powered investigation of the patterns observed here is warranted in future studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruggero, L., Croot, K., & Nickels, L. (2023). Quality of Life Ratings and Proxy Bias in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Two Sides to the Story? American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 38. https://doi.org/10.1177/15333175231177668

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free