The puzzle of spontaneous alternation and inhibition of return: How they might fit together

7Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two isolated spatial phenomena share a similar “been there; done that” effect on spatial behavior. Originally discovered in rodent learning experiments, spontaneous alternation is a tendency for the organism to visit a different arm in a T-maze on subsequent trials. Originally discovered in human studies of attention, inhibition of return is a tendency for the organism to orient away from a previously attended location. Whereas spontaneous alternation was identified by O'Keefe & Nadel as dependent on an intact hippocampus, inhibition of return is dependent on neural structures that participate in oculomotor control (the superior colliculus, parietal and frontal cortex). Despite the isolated literatures, each phenomenon has been assumed to reflect a basic novelty-seeking process, avoiding places previously visited or locations attended. In this commentary, we explore and compare the behavioral manifestations and neural underpinnings of these two phenomena, and suggest what is still needed to determine whether they operate in parallel or serial.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phillmore, L. S., & Klein, R. M. (2019, August 1). The puzzle of spontaneous alternation and inhibition of return: How they might fit together. Hippocampus. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free