Azathioprine versus d‐penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have been treated unsuccessfully with gold

42Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two hundred six patients were entered into a prospective controlled, double‐blind, multicenter trial comparing azathioprine (AZA) 1.25–1.5 mg/kg/day with D‐penicillamine (DP) 10–12 mg/kg/day. One hundred thirty‐four patients completed 24 weeks of therapy. Improvement in nearly all efficacy variables was seen in both groups. Patients taking DP demonstrated a greater rise in hemoglobin concentration and greater fall in erythrocyte sedimentation rate than patients receiving AZA; these were the only efficacy variables with a significant difference between the treatment groups. Fewer withdrawals for adverse reactions occurred among the patients receiving AZA, but the difference was not significant. Patients receiving AZA were withdrawn from the drug mainly for abnormal liver function test results, nausea and gastrointestinal upset, and leukopenia. The main reasons for withdrawal of patients receiving DP were nausea, rash and pruritis, thrombo‐cytopenia, dysgeusia, and proteinuria. Copyright © 1984 American College of Rheumatology

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paulus, H. E., Williams, H. J., Ward, J. R., Reading, J. C., Egger, M. J., Coleman, M. L., … Meenan, R. F. (1984). Azathioprine versus d‐penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have been treated unsuccessfully with gold. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 27(7), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780270701

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free