Estimating N 2 O emissions from soils under natural vegetation in China

20Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Natural and managed soils have been identified as the largest sources of atmospheric nitrous oxide (N 2 O). However, the quantification of N 2 O emissions from soils under natural vegetation in China and their possible responses to changing climate and atmospheric nitrogen deposition remains uncertain. In particular, information regarding N 2 O emissions from Chinese shrublands is lacking. Method: This study used 28 sets of N 2 O field measurements in China to validate a process-based dynamic nitrogen cycle model (DyN-LPJ), which was then used to investigate the N 2 O fluxes from soils under natural vegetation in China from 1970 to 2009. Results: N 2 O emissions from Chinese forests, grasslands, and shrublands in the 2000s were estimated to be 0.10 ± 0.06 Tg N yr. −1 , 0.09 ± 0.09, Tg N yr. −1 and 0.14 ± 0.07 Tg N yr. −1 , respectively. Monthly N 2 O fluxes were linearly correlated with precipitation, and exponentially (Q 10 = 3) with air temperature. The total N 2 O fluxes from natural terrestrial ecosystems in China increased from 0.28 ± 0.03 Tg N yr. −1 in the 1970s to 0.46 ± 0.03 Tg N yr. −1 in the 2000s. Warming and atmospheric nitrogen deposition accounted for 37% (or 0.07 ± 0.03 Tg N) and 63% (0.11 ± 0.01 Tg N) of this increase respectively. Conclusions: Our results indicate that when compared to grassland ecosystems, N 2 O emissions from forest and shrubland ecosystems contain larger uncertainties due to either their uncertain areal extent or their emission rates. Long-term and continuous field measurements should be conducted to obtain more representative data in order to better constrain shrubland N 2 O emissions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu-Ri, Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Niu, H., Liu, Y., & Zhuang, Q. (2019). Estimating N 2 O emissions from soils under natural vegetation in China. Plant and Soil, 434(1–2), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3856-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free