Does cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder qualify as a diagnostic intermediate phenotype? - A perspective paper

23Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present perspective paper addresses and discusses whether cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder qualifies as a diagnostic intermediate phenotype using the Robin and Guze criteria of diagnostic validity. The paper reviews current data within (1) delineation of the clinical intermediate phenotype, (2) associations of the intermediate phenotype with para-clinical data such as brain imaging and bloodbased data, (3) associations to family history/ genetics, (4) characteristics during long-term follow-up, and (5) treatment effects on cognition. In this way, the paper identifies knowledge gaps and suggests recommendations for future research within each of the five areas. Based on the current state of knowledge, we conclude that cognitive dysfunction does not qualify as a diagnostic intermediate phenotype or endophenotype for bipolar disorder, although promising new evidence points to emotion and reward processing abnormalities as possible putative endophenotypes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kessing, L. V., & Miskowiak, K. (2018, October 8). Does cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder qualify as a diagnostic intermediate phenotype? - A perspective paper. Frontiers in Psychiatry. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free