Thomas Kuhn dan Teori Hubungan Internasional: Realisme sebagai Paradigma

  • Asrudin A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
972Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This writing is the writer’s objections against Peter Van Ness’ claim on realist paradigm. In reference to Thomas Kuhn’s paradigm shift, Van Ness argued that realism, as what Kuhn would call “normal science” in international relations theory, is in a crisis because of its inability to explain some anomalies. According to Van Ness, rampant number of states doing security cooperation is enough to call realism is in a crisis as a paradigm. Through several cases on international anarchy, the writer argues that realism is still relevant and worthy to be called a paradigm in Kuhnian category.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asrudin, A. (2017). Thomas Kuhn dan Teori Hubungan Internasional: Realisme sebagai Paradigma. Global South Review, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.28830

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free