Abstract
Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along with RT-qPCR and commercially available comparators (BinaxNOW® and Sofia®). Adult patients with suspected COVID-19 based on clinical signs and symptoms, and with symptoms ≤7 days duration, underwent anterior nares (AN) sampling for the OA-LFA, Sofia®, BinaxNOW ™, and RT-qPCR, along with nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-qPCR. Results indicate a positive predictive agreement with NP sampling as 69% (60% -78%) OA-LFA, 74% (64% - 82%) Sofia®, and 82% (73% - 88%) BinaxNOW™. The implication for these results is that we provide an open-access LFA design that meets the minimum WHO target product profile for a rapid test, that virtually any diagnostic manufacturer could produce.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bachman, C. M., Grant, B. D., Anderson, C. E., Alonzo, L. F., Garing, S., Byrnes, S. A., … Dewan, P. (2021). Clinical validation of an open-access SARSCOV- 2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays. PLoS ONE, 16(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256352
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.