Clinical validation of an open-access SARSCOV- 2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays

18Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along with RT-qPCR and commercially available comparators (BinaxNOW® and Sofia®). Adult patients with suspected COVID-19 based on clinical signs and symptoms, and with symptoms ≤7 days duration, underwent anterior nares (AN) sampling for the OA-LFA, Sofia®, BinaxNOW ™, and RT-qPCR, along with nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-qPCR. Results indicate a positive predictive agreement with NP sampling as 69% (60% -78%) OA-LFA, 74% (64% - 82%) Sofia®, and 82% (73% - 88%) BinaxNOW™. The implication for these results is that we provide an open-access LFA design that meets the minimum WHO target product profile for a rapid test, that virtually any diagnostic manufacturer could produce.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bachman, C. M., Grant, B. D., Anderson, C. E., Alonzo, L. F., Garing, S., Byrnes, S. A., … Dewan, P. (2021). Clinical validation of an open-access SARSCOV- 2 antigen detection lateral flow assay, compared to commercially available assays. PLoS ONE, 16(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256352

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free