Comparing ovarian radiation doses in flat-panel and conventional angiography during uterine artery embolization: A randomized clinical trial

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure performed under fluoroscopy for the treatment of uterine fibroids and accompanied by radiation exposure. Objectives: To compare ovarian radiation doses during uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients using conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with those using digital flat-panel technology. Patients and Methods: Thirty women who were candidates for UAE were randomly enrolled for one of the two angiographic systems. Ovarian doses were calculated according to in-vitro phantom study results using entrance and exit doses and were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean right entrance dose was 1586±1221 mGy in the conventional and 522.3±400.1 mGy in the flat panel group (P=0.005). These figures were 1470±1170 mGy and 456±396 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.006). The mean right exit dose was 18.8±12.3 for the conventional and 9.4±6.4 mGy for the flat panel group (P=0.013). These figures were 16.7±11.3 and 10.2±7.2 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.06). The mean right ovarian dose was 139.9±92 in the conventional and 23.6±16.2 mGy in the flat panel group (P<0.0001). These figures were 101.7±77.6 and 24.6±16.9 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.002). Conclusion: Flat panel system can significantly reduce the ovarian radiation dose during UAE compared with conventional DSA. © 2013, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology; Licensee KowsarKowsar Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Firouznia, K., Ghanaati, H., Sharafi, A., Abahashemi, F., Hashemi, H., Jalali, A. H., & Shakiba, M. (2013). Comparing ovarian radiation doses in flat-panel and conventional angiography during uterine artery embolization: A randomized clinical trial. Iranian Journal of Radiology, 10(3), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.13264

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free