The regular monitoring of erythema, one of the most important skin lesions in atopic (al-lergic) dogs, is essential for successful anti-allergic therapy. The smartphone-based dermatoscopy enables a convenient way to acquire quality images of erythematous skin. However, the image sampling to evaluate erythema severity is still done manually, introducing result variability. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the most popular erythema indices (EIs) and derma-tologists’ erythema perception, and we measured intra-and inter-rater variability of the currently-used manual image-sampling methods (ISMs). We showed that the EIBRG, based on all three RGB (red, green, and blue) channels, performed the best with an average Spearman coefficient of 0.75 and a typical absolute disagreement of less than 14% with the erythema assessed by clinicians. On the other hand, two image-sampling methods, based on either selecting specific pixels or small skin areas, performed similarly well. They achieved high intra-and inter-rater reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Krippendorff’s alpha well above 0.90. These results indicated that smartphone-based dermatoscopy could be a convenient and precise way to evaluate skin erythema severity. However, better outlined, or even automated ISMs, are likely to improve the intra-and inter-rater reliability in severe erythematous cases.
CITATION STYLE
Cugmas, B., Viškere, D., Štruc, E., & Olivry, T. (2021). Evaluation of erythema severity in dermatoscopic images of canine skin: Erythema index assessment and image sampling reliability. Sensors (Switzerland), 21(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041285
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.