The effect of tube quality on externally calibrated quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance analysis: How bad can it be?

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Externally calibrated quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) approaches offer practical means to simultaneously evaluate chemical identity and content without the addition of calibrants to the test sample. Despite continuous advances in external calibration over the last few decades, adoption of these approaches has been slower than expected. Variations in NMR tube geometry are a commonly overlooked factor that can have a substantial effect on externally calibrated quantitation methods. In this report, we investigate the extent to which tube-to-tube volume variability can affect quantitative NMR outcomes. The results highlight the importance of considering tube quality during the development stages of externally calibrated quantitative methods. In addition, we propose a simple, yet effective volume correction strategy using the residual protonated solvent signal that, based on experiments with mixed NMR tubes of varying quality, alleviates the effect of tube-to-tube variability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ochoa, J. L., Germann, S., Conklin, B., Kurita, K., Russell, D. J., Yang, C., & Napolitano, J. G. (2024). The effect of tube quality on externally calibrated quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance analysis: How bad can it be? Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 62(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.5404

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free