The Politics of Accounting Standards: A Comment on Ramanna's "Unreliable Accounts: How Regulators Fabricate Conceptual Narratives to Diffuse Criticism"

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Karthik Ramanna recounts how the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) dropped "reliability"as a fundamental property of accounting in 2010. He offers two possible explanations for this change: (1) The FASB removed reliability to clarify its conceptual framework, and (2) It sought to reconcile its framework with the growing use of fair-value accounting. Ramanna does not give total victory to one explanation over another, nor does he assign purely public- or private-interest motives to the actors in the story. Yet this very ambiguity tells us a lot about the distinctive politics of accounting and other technical realms of regulation, and exposes some of the shortcomings of more standard interest-group models in political science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vogel, S. K. (2022). The Politics of Accounting Standards: A Comment on Ramanna’s “Unreliable Accounts: How Regulators Fabricate Conceptual Narratives to Diffuse Criticism.” Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium, 12(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free