Comparison of two methods for detecting varicella-zoster virus antibody with varicella-zoster virus cell-mediated immunity

11Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We evaluated an enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA; BioWhittaker) and a latex agglutination (LA; Becton Dickinson) for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) antibody determination, using cell-mediated immunity (CMI) as a 'gold standard.' VZV EIA had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 87, 91, 87, and 91%, respectively, compared with CMI. Correlation was excellent except when the varicella index was 0.9 to 1.2. We defined sera with varicella indices of 0.9 to 1.2 as indeterminate. LA had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 96, 91, 97, and 90%, respectively, compared with EIA. LA reactivity only at a 1:2 dilution did not correlate with CMI, but sera reactive at dilutions of ≥1:8 indirectly did. We defined indeterminate sera as those reactive at 1:2 and nonreactive at 1:8. EIA and LA were equivalent for determining VZV immune status, and both methods required modified criteria of interpretation to increase their specificity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weinberg, A., Hayward, A. R., Masters, H. B., Ogu, I. A., & Levin, M. J. (1996). Comparison of two methods for detecting varicella-zoster virus antibody with varicella-zoster virus cell-mediated immunity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 34(2), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.2.445-446.1996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free