The time of death in Dutch court; using the Daubert criteria to evaluate methods to estimate the PMI used in court

27Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When a capital crime is committed the post-mortem interval (PMI) is of particular importance in investigating a suspect's alibi in court. A forensic expert can use different methods to estimate the PMI. This research focuses on who is considered an expert in court and whether the methods used to estimate the PMI are reliable. In this study, the methods used to estimate the PMI and the experts consulted, available in Dutch jurisprudence, in the period 2010–2019 were investigated. Ninety-four judicial cases were included and multiple experts and methods of estimating the PMI were found. As part of this study, the methods that were used to estimate the PMI in court were subjected to the Daubert criteria. Of these methods, only the Henssge nomogram and entomological methods met the Daubert criteria. However, the methods are only useful when applied by the right forensic expert and in the right manner. Unfortunately, this was not always the case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gelderman, T., Stigter, E., Krap, T., Amendt, J., & Duijst, W. (2021). The time of death in Dutch court; using the Daubert criteria to evaluate methods to estimate the PMI used in court. Legal Medicine, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101970

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free