Changing surgical principles for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - Is laparoscopic fundoplication justified in the light of surgical complications?

20Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality after surgical treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) can be considerable. During the past decade the dynamic evolution of laparoscopic surgery has seen this technique applied for GORD. In this chapter I will discuss perioperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. I base my remarks on publications from all over the world, a national questionnaire, and a restricted national register. Only one randomised study has been reported, which concluded that there was no difference between conventional open and laparoscopic operations. A number of non-randomised studies have reported complications and clinical results in the same range as previously reported after open operations. More than half the surgical units in Sweden do laparoscopic fundoplications. In the questionnaire complications were reported in >2%, but the mortality was extremely low, <0.2%. These complications included postoperative paraoesophageal herniation, perforations, and reoperations for other reasons. There is a learning curve before complication rates are reduced.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lind, T. (2000). Changing surgical principles for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - Is laparoscopic fundoplication justified in the light of surgical complications? In European Journal of Surgery, Supplement (Vol. 165, pp. 31–33). https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750056517

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free