Toward programmatic research on virtue assessment: Challenges and prospects

30Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Poor construct definition has characterized research on virtue, beginning with Hartshorne and May's honesty studies and continuing to the present. Recently, scholars have begun to define virtues in ways that improve the prospects for measuring virtue constructs, but a coordinated, programmatic approach is necessary for success in virtue measurement. A brief overview of the construct of virtue includes six key elements that can structure virtue assessment design. Recent research on the trait/situation problem suggests that situational factors do not obviate traits. Veridicality issues such as social desirability and positive illusions are significant challenges for self-report virtue measurement. In summary self-report measures, these challenges can be met with a number of methods, including directly assessing social desirability and item construction to remove social desirability. These challenges can also be met using other-reports, experience sampling, or experimental procedures. A brief discussion of construct validity in virtue measurement leads to the conclusion that many studies with a variety of methods are necessary to establish valid measures of virtue. © 2014, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fowers, B. J. (2014). Toward programmatic research on virtue assessment: Challenges and prospects. Theory and Research in Education, 12(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878514546064

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free