Risk factors and clinical outcomes of incomplete endoscopic resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors in southern China: a 9-year data analysis

Abstract

Background: The histologically complete resection (CR) rate of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (RNETs) is unsatisfactory at the first endoscopy. Risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with incomplete resection (IR) have not been explicitly elucidated. This study aims to explore the relevant factors of IR. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patients with small RNETs (≤10 mm) in eight centers from January 2013 to December 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the CR and IR groups, and the polypectomy and advanced treatment groups. Results: Of the 326 patients included, 83 (25.5%) were diagnosed with IR. Polypectomy (odds ratio [OR] ¼ 16.86), a central depression (OR ¼ 7.50), and treatment in the early period (OR ¼ 2.60) were closely associated with IR. Further analysis revealed that an atypical hyperemic appearance (OR ¼ 7.49) and treatment in the early period (OR ¼ 2.54) were significantly associated with the inappropriate use of polypectomy (both P < 0.05). In addition, a total of 265 (81.3%) were followed up with a median follow-up period of 30.9 months. No death, metastasis, or recurrence was found during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Polypectomy, a central depression, and treatment in the early period were risk factors for IR. Further, an atypical hyperemic appearance and treatment in the early period were significant predisposing factors for inappropriate choice of polypectomy. For histologically incompletely resected small RNETs, follow-up may be a safe and feasible alternative to rigorous salvage therapy.