Analysis of Available Design Implementation Methods. A Study About Scarcity of Implementation Methods

1Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This poster demonstrates how implementation methods are scarce. Usually designers have methods for user research, data gathering, insights framing, ideas generation, solutions framing and so on. But, as important as other stages, implementation requires specifi c methods to create the right scenario for the execution of the action plan. This analysis compares different sources of tools (Curedale, 2013; IDEO, 2017; Kumar, 2012; Moritz, 2005; Ogilvie & Liedtka, 2011; Stickdorn, Schneider, Andrews, & Lawrence, 2011; Tassi & Gorla, 2009), under the perspective of availability of implementation tools. It also compares different design and project frameworks as Kumar, Prince 2, PMBOK, Agile, Design for Six Sigma, Six Sigma, PDCA, Kaizen, Double Diamond and Service Design.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martins, R. (2017). Analysis of Available Design Implementation Methods. A Study About Scarcity of Implementation Methods. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S4730–S4733. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free