Effect of Ammonium on Nitrate Utilization by Roots of Dwarf Bean

  • Breteler H
  • Siegerist M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The effect of exogenous NH(4) (+) on NO(3) (-) uptake and in vivo NO(3) (-) reductase activity (NRA) in roots of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv Witte Krombek was studied before, during, and after the apparent induction of root NRA and NO(3) (-) uptake. Pretreatment with NH(4)Cl (0.15-50 millimolar) affected neither the time pattern nor the steady state rate of NO(3) (-) uptake.When NH(4) (+) was given at the start of NO(3) (-) nutrition, the time pattern of NO(3) (-) uptake was the same as in plants receiving no NH(4) (+). After 6 hours, however, the NO(3) (-) uptake rate (NUR) and root NRA were inhibited by NH(4) (+) to a maximum of 45% and 60%, respectively.The response of the NUR of NO(3) (-)-induced plants depended on the NH(4)Cl concentration. Below 1 millimolar NH(4) (+), the NUR declined immediately and some restoration occurred in the second hour. In the third hour, the NUR became constant. In contrast, NH(4) (+) at 2 millimolar and above caused a rapid and transient stimulation of NO(3) (-) uptake, followed again by a decrease in the first, a recovery in the second, and a steady state in the third hour. Maximal inhibition of steady state NUR was 50%. With NO(3) (-)-induced plants, root NRA responded less and more slowly to NH(4) (+) than did NUR.Methionine sulfoximine and azaserine, inhibitors of glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase, respectively, relieved the NH(4) (+) inhibition of the NUR of NO(3) (-)-induced plants. We conclude that repression of the NUR by NH(4) (+) depends on NH(4) (+) assimilation. The repression by NH(4) (+) was least at the lowest and highest NH(4) (+) levels tested (0.04 and 25 millimolar).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Breteler, H., & Siegerist, M. (1984). Effect of Ammonium on Nitrate Utilization by Roots of Dwarf Bean. Plant Physiology, 75(4), 1099–1103. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.75.4.1099

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free