Knotless Fixation Is Stronger and Less Variable Than Knotted Constructs in Securing a Suture Loop

17Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Historically, tendon-to-bone fixation has relied on knot tying. However, considerable variability exists in knot-tying strength among surgeons. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of knotted and knotless fixation and to evaluate variability among surgeons. The hypothesis was that knotless constructs would be stronger and have less variability as compared with knotted constructs. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 34 orthopaedic surgeons participated in a laboratory study to compare knotted and knotless constructs, where 104 knotted constructs were performed with No. 2 suture, 21 knotless constructs with No. 2 suture (K2 group), and 79 knotless constructs with suture tape (KT group). Mechanical testing was performed to compare load at 3 mm of displacement, load to failure, and stiffness of each construct. Results: The mean load at 3 mm of displacement was greatest in the KT group, with significant differences among all 3 groups (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Denard, P. J., Adams, C. R., Fischer, N. C., Piepenbrink, M., & Wijdicks, C. A. (2018). Knotless Fixation Is Stronger and Less Variable Than Knotted Constructs in Securing a Suture Loop. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118774000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free