Achieving effective patient and public involvement in international clinical trials in neurology

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is a growing need for patient and public involvement (PPI) to inform the way that research is developed and performed. International randomized controlled trials are particularly likely to benefit from PPI, but guidance is lacking on how or when it should be incorporated. In this article, we describe the PPI process that occurred during the design and initiation of an international treatment clinical trial in MS. PPI was incorporated using a structured approach, aiming to minimize bias and achieve equivalence in study design, implementation, and interpretation. Methods included PPI representation within the study research team, and the use of focus groups, analyzed using thematic framework analysis. We report the outcomes of PPI and make recommendations on its use in other neurology clinical trials. By sharing our model for PPI, we aim to maximize effectiveness of future public involvement and to allow its effect to be better evaluated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tallantyre, E. C., Evangelou, N., Bale, C., Chaudhry, B. Z., Gray, E. H., Larocca, N., … Manzano, A. (2020, June 1). Achieving effective patient and public involvement in international clinical trials in neurology. Neurology: Clinical Practice. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000739

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free