The Relationship Between Nursing Students’ Self-Efficiency and Vocational Motivation

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: The study was conducted to determine the relationship between nursing students’ self-efficacy levels and their vocational motivation. Method: This descriptive and correlational study was conducted online at a public university in the 2019-2020 academic year, with 406 undergraduate nursing students. Data were collected using the Introductory Information Form, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Scale of Motivation Sources and Problems. Descriptive statistics, independent groups t test, One way ANOVA, correlation, and linear regression tests were used in the analysis of the data. Results: It was determined that 255 (62.8%) female students participated in the study including 123 (30.3%) 2nd grade students and the mean age of the study population was 20.38±1.83 years. Students’ self-efficacy, and professional motivation mean scores were determined as 60.49±10.15, and 84.93±11.94, respectively. A highly significant positive correlation was found between the total score averages of the self-efficacy, and motivation scales and the intrinsic motivation subdimension. While gender did not affect self-efficacy and professional motivation, the total scores of self-efficacy and motivation and negative motivation subdimension scores of senior students were found to be high (p<0.05). Conclusion: Nursing students’ self-efficacy mean scores were found to be at a medium level and their motivation mean scores were relatively higher. It was found that nursing students with a high level of self-efficacy have higher levels of motivation. It was determined that self-efficacy and motivation levels of fourth-grade students’ were higher than other grades.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cengiz, Z., Gürdap, Z., Karaca, E., & Acun, M. (2021). The Relationship Between Nursing Students’ Self-Efficiency and Vocational Motivation. Journal of Health and Nursing Management, 8(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.5222/SHYD.2021.24855

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free