Evaluation of an automated laminar cartilage T2 relaxation time analysis method in an early osteoarthritis model

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: A fully automated laminar cartilage composition (MRI-based T2) analysis method was technically and clinically validated by comparing radiographically normal knees with (CL-JSN) and without contra-lateral joint space narrowing or other signs of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA, CL-noROA). Materials and methods: 2D U-Nets were trained from manually segmented femorotibial cartilages (n = 72) from all 7 echoes (AllE), or from the 1st echo only (1stE) of multi-echo-spin-echo (MESE) MRIs acquired by the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Because of its greater accuracy, only the AllE U-Net was then applied to knees from the OAI healthy reference cohort (n = 10), CL-JSN (n = 39), and (1:1) matched CL-noROA knees (n = 39) that all had manual expert segmentation, and to 982 non-matched CL-noROA knees without expert segmentation. Results: The agreement (Dice similarity coefficient) between automated vs. manual expert cartilage segmentation was between 0.82 ± 0.05/0.79 ± 0.06 (AllE/1stE) and 0.88 ± 0.03/0.88 ± 0.03 (AllE/1stE) across femorotibial cartilage plates. The deviation between automated vs. manually derived laminar T2 reached up to − 2.2 ± 2.6 ms/ + 4.1 ± 10.2 ms (AllE/1stE). The AllE U-Net showed a similar sensitivity to cross-sectional laminar T2 differences between CL-JSN and CL-noROA knees in the matched (Cohen’s D ≤ 0.54) and the non-matched (D ≤ 0.54) comparison as the matched manual analyses (D ≤ 0.48). Longitudinally, the AllE U-Net also showed a similar sensitivity to CL-JSN vs. CS-noROA differences in the matched (D ≤ 0.51) and the non-matched (D ≤ 0.43) comparison as matched manual analyses (D ≤ 0.41). Conclusion: The fully automated T2 analysis showed a high agreement, acceptable accuracy, and similar sensitivity to cross-sectional and longitudinal laminar T2 differences in an early OA model, compared with manual expert analysis. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identification: NCT00080171.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wirth, W., Maschek, S., Wisser, A., Eder, J., Baumgartner, C. F., Chaudhari, A., … Eckstein, F. (2025). Evaluation of an automated laminar cartilage T2 relaxation time analysis method in an early osteoarthritis model. Skeletal Radiology, 54(3), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04786-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free