Renal Transplantation with Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch

60Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Solid phase immunoassays (SPI) are now routinely used to detect HLA antibodies. However, the flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) remains the established method for assessing final donor-recipient compatibility. Since 2005 we have followed a protocol whereby the final allocation decision for renal transplantation is based on SPI (not the FCXM). Here we report long-term graft outcomes for 508 consecutive kidney transplants using this protocol. All recipients were negative for donor-specific antibody by SPI. Primary outcomes are graft survival and incidence of acute rejection within 1 year (AR <1 year) for FCXM+ (n = 54) and FCXM- (n = 454) recipients. Median follow-up is 7.1 years. FCXM+ recipients were significantly different from FCXM- recipients for the following risk factors: living donor (24% vs. 39%, p = 0.03), duration of dialysis (31.0 months vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.008), retransplants (17% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.04), % sensitized (63% vs. 19%, p = 0.001), and PRA >80% (20% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.001). Despite these differences, 5-year actual graft survival rates are 87% and 84%, respectively. AR <1 year occurred in 13% FCXM+ and 12% FCXM- recipients. Crossmatch status was not associated with graft outcomes in any univariate or multivariate model. Renal transplantation can be performed successfully, using SPI as the definitive test for donor-recipient compatibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, C. P., Schiller, J. J., Zhu, Y. R., Hariharan, S., Roza, A. M., Cronin, D. C., … Ellis, T. M. (2016). Renal Transplantation with Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch. American Journal of Transplantation, 16(5), 1503–1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13606

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free