US-Tyres: Upholding a WTO accession contract-imposing pain for little gain

9Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 2009, the United States imposed additional tariffs for a three-year period on imports of automotive tires from China under a special-safeguard provision included in China's Protocol of Accession to the WTO. China challenged the measure in the WTO. The case marked the first WTO dispute in which a challenged safeguard was upheld by the Appellate Body; the first in which an accession protocol was used successfully as a defense; and the first that China lost as a complaining party. It also was noteworthy in that the safeguard was sought by a labor union, not the domestic industry. This paper reviews the WTO Appellate Body's findings and discusses a number of the legal and policy implications regarding China's Accession Protocol, the Safeguards Agreement, and WTO accession law, as well as economic aspects of the case. © Michael Hahn and Kirtikumar Mehta.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Charnovitz, S., & Hoekman, B. (2013). US-Tyres: Upholding a WTO accession contract-imposing pain for little gain. World Trade Review, 12(2), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745612000602

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free