Abstract
In 2009, the United States imposed additional tariffs for a three-year period on imports of automotive tires from China under a special-safeguard provision included in China's Protocol of Accession to the WTO. China challenged the measure in the WTO. The case marked the first WTO dispute in which a challenged safeguard was upheld by the Appellate Body; the first in which an accession protocol was used successfully as a defense; and the first that China lost as a complaining party. It also was noteworthy in that the safeguard was sought by a labor union, not the domestic industry. This paper reviews the WTO Appellate Body's findings and discusses a number of the legal and policy implications regarding China's Accession Protocol, the Safeguards Agreement, and WTO accession law, as well as economic aspects of the case. © Michael Hahn and Kirtikumar Mehta.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Charnovitz, S., & Hoekman, B. (2013). US-Tyres: Upholding a WTO accession contract-imposing pain for little gain. World Trade Review, 12(2), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745612000602
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.