The Impact of Digital Participation on Democratic Urban Governance

9Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This concluding chapter examines the effect on democracy of different approaches to the digitalization of citizen participation. We investigate how well different e-participation models perform on the dimensions of inclusiveness, deliberation and popular control, the models examined being the online direct democracy model in Madrid, the digital crowdsourcing model in Melbourne and the e-bricolage model in Oslo. Digital technologies can, compared with analogue participation, enable cities to reach out to a larger number of people and strengthen the role of citizens in decision-making. The limitations of digital participation are revealed or confirmed by this study. Digital technologies can mobilize more citizens, but at the same time reinforce existing inequalities. High-quality deliberation is also difficult to achieve through online platforms. This study shows that the approach applied by cities to digitalization impacts the level of democracy achieved. This should be useful to practitioners designing systems of citizen participation in other cities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Legard, S., & Hovik, S. (2022). The Impact of Digital Participation on Democratic Urban Governance. In Citizen Participation in the Information Society: Comparing Participatory Channels in Urban Development (pp. 167–190). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99940-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free