Influence of freezing temperature before freeze-drying on the viability of various Lactobacillus plantarum strains

81Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although freeze-drying is an excellent method for preserving microorganisms, it inevitably reduces cell activity and function. Moreover, probiotic strains differ in terms of their sensitivity to the freeze-drying process. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the variables relevant to this process. The pre-freezing temperature is a critical parameter of the freeze-drying process, but it remains unclear whether the optimal pre-freezing temperature differs among strains and protectants. This study explored the effects of 4 different pre-freezing temperatures on the survival rates of different Lactobacillus plantarum strains after freeze-drying in the presence of different protectants. Using phosphate-buffered saline solution and sorbitol as protectants, pre-freezing at −196°C, −40°C, and −20°C ensured the highest survival rates after freeze-drying for AR113, AR307, and WCFS1, respectively. Using trehalose, pre-freezing at −20°C ensured the best survival rate for AR113, and −60°C was the best pre-freezing temperature for AR307 and WCFS1. These results indicate that the pre-freezing temperature can be changed to improve the survival rate of L. plantarum, and that this effect is strain-specific. Further studies have demonstrated that pre-freezing temperature affected viability via changes in cell membrane integrity, membrane permeability, and lactate dehydrogenase activity. In summary, pre-freezing temperature is a crucial factor in L. plantarum survival after freeze-drying, and the choice of pre-freezing temperature depends on the strain and the protectant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, G. Q., Pu, J., Yu, X. Q., Xia, Y. J., & Ai, L. Z. (2020). Influence of freezing temperature before freeze-drying on the viability of various Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(4), 3066–3075. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17685

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free