Impact of osmotic backwashing, particle size distribution and feed-side cross-flow velocity on flux in the forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FO-MBR)

28Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The application of the forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FO-MBR) requires further investigation in the area of process optimization. In current study, different operational parameters for improving the overall efficiency of FO-MBR were studied and optimized in batch and semi-continuous experiments. The effect of osmotic backwashing, cross-flow velocity of the feed solution (activated sludge), and particle size were studied on the FO-MBR flux. All batch experiments were of 8 h duration, comprising 7 h filtration and 1 h osmotic backwash. It was found that osmotic backwashing was ineffective for complete flux recovery in a hollow fibre FO-MBR, due to severity of the fouling caused by the activated sludge feed in ‘active layer facing draw solution’ mode. A slightly better recovery was observed however with a single 60 min backwash as compared to 2 backwash cycles of 30 min each or 3 backwash cycles of 20 min each. A cross-flow velocity of 0.105 m/s proved optimum. Higher velocities caused a breakdown of flocs and reduced the mean particle size, the latter resulting in lower water flux. Similarly, lower cross flow velocities were not able to provide effective membrane scouring, resulting in lower water flux. The particle size decreased with operational time in the FO-MBR. It was also established that, above the optimum cross flow velocity, flux is inversely proportional to the difference between the initial and final particle size of sludge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nawaz, M. S., Parveen, F., Khan, S. J., & Hankins, N. P. (2019). Impact of osmotic backwashing, particle size distribution and feed-side cross-flow velocity on flux in the forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FO-MBR). Journal of Water Process Engineering, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100861

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free