Adherence to anti-osteoporotic treatment and clinical implications after hip fracture: A systematic review

16Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The role of anti-osteoporotic treatment as part of the secondary prevention after hip fracture in terms of mortality and re-fracture risk has been studied, and the results are promising. Decreased treatment adherence and compliance is a problem that needs to be addressed by healthcare professionals. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database with terms that included hip fracture, mortality, second fracture, and specific anti-osteoporotic treatment. We included 28 articles, 21 regarding mortality and 20 re-fracture rates in hip fracture patients. All studies showed lower mortality after hip fracture associated with anti-osteoporotic treatment, mostly bisphosphonate agents. The re-fracture risk is still debatable, since conflicting data were found. Although most of the studies showed notable effects on mortality and re-fracture rates associated with anti-osteoporotic treatment, we still need more data to validate the actual results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dobre, R., Niculescu, D. A., Petca, R. C., Popescu, R. I., Petca, A., & Poiană, C. (2021, May 1). Adherence to anti-osteoporotic treatment and clinical implications after hip fracture: A systematic review. Journal of Personalized Medicine. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free