Misgivings on Deliberative Democracy: Revisiting the Deliberative Framework

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the last few years, the Deliberative Framework has become the main model in the consolidation of democratic processes. Deliberative theorists argue that deliberation helps to promote the democratic level of our societies, and they have good reasons to support this view. This article, however, is critical with some of these claims, questioning the widespread assumption of an existing connection between deliberation and democracy. With this objective in mind, we will examine the following three questions: Who deliberates? Under what conditions does deliberation take place? What is the content of deliberation? Once the potential repressive components of deliberation are made clear, we try to reach some normative considerations regarding how to promote certain mechanisms of deliberation that are in fact more in line with deliberative emancipation ideas and, as such, better assertions for promoting democracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martinez-Bascunann, M. (2016). Misgivings on Deliberative Democracy: Revisiting the Deliberative Framework. World Political Science, 12(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/wps-2016-0006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free