Effects of Low Doses of Ketamine on Pyramidal Neurons in Rat Prefrontal Cortex

17Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Indirect evidence suggests that low doses of ketamine disinhibit (excite) pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). In this study, we directly examined the effect of ketamine on PFC pyramidal neurons using simultaneous single-cell and local-field-potential (LFP) recording in chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats. In all animals studied, PFC LFPs showed oscillations (0.3–1.5 Hz) between the active UP state and the relatively quiescent DOWN state, and pyramidal neurons fired preferentially during the UP state. Ketamine (1.25–20 mg/kg, i.v.) inhibited 80% of cells tested and consistently shifted PFC LFPs toward the DOWN state. The inhibitory effect of ketamine was mimicked by MK801, but not by the NR2B-selective NMDA receptor antagonist Ro25-6981. It was not blocked by the dopamine receptor antagonist fluphenazine, the GABAA receptor antagonist picrotoxinin, or the GABAB receptor antagonist CGP46381. These results are consistent with the high density of NMDA receptors expressed on PFC pyramidal neurons and our previous studies showing that blockade of NMDA receptors by ketamine inhibits dendritic NMDA receptor-mediated bursting in PFC pyramidal neurons. Thus, in addition to the previously proposed disinhibitory effect mediated through PFC interneurons, our data suggest that ketamine has an inhibitory effect on PFC pyramidal neurons. Our evidence further suggests that the effect is mediated through non-NR2B-containing NMDA receptors, independent of ketamine's effect on dopamine and GABA transmission. Further understanding of the two opposing effects of ketamine on PFC pyramidal neurons may provide important new insights into its mechanism of action.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shen, G., Han, F., & Shi, W. X. (2018). Effects of Low Doses of Ketamine on Pyramidal Neurons in Rat Prefrontal Cortex. Neuroscience, 384, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.05.037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free