Comparison of efficacy and side effects of multispot lasers and conventional lasers for diabetic retinopathy treatment

13Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is a standard treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Conventional laser (CL) therapy is performed in one or more sessions in single spot mode. Visual disabilities have been reported after treatment with CL, including central vision loss due to macular edema and peripheral visual field loss resulting from extensive inner retinal scarring. Multispot laser (MSL) photocoagulation has recently been introduced to clinical practice. Studies comparing PRP conducted with MSL and CL have reported that MSLs resulted in less retinal tissue damage and pain, and greater patient comfort compared to CL. The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy and side effects of MSLs and CLs for diabetic retinopathy treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Çeliker, H., Bulut, A. E., & Şahin, Ö. (2017). Comparison of efficacy and side effects of multispot lasers and conventional lasers for diabetic retinopathy treatment. Turk Oftalmoloiji Dergisi. Turkish Ophthalmology Society. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.75032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free