Storing and sharing: A review of indigenous and local knowledge conservation initiatives

31Citations
Citations of this article
168Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite its relative adaptive capacity and its many values, indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is rapidly eroding. Over the past decades a myriad of efforts have emerged to prevent this erosion. In this work, we reviewed and systematically coded 138 ILK conservation initiatives published in academic papers in order to explore trends in participation, digitalization, timing, location, and approach of the initiatives. We also explored factors influencing initiative inclusiveness. Our findings reveal that ILK holders are generally absent from most phases of the studied initiatives, although IT-based and in situ initiatives (i.e., education and community based conservation) appear as the exceptions. We also found that ex situ initiatives (i.e., research/documentation and policy/legislation efforts) are predominant, despite the challenges they reportedly face. These findings call for re-formulating the ways in which ex situ ILK conservation is done and for supporting in situ and IT based initiatives, as they offer the potential to lead the participatory turn.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benyei, P., Arreola, G., & Reyes-García, V. (2020). Storing and sharing: A review of indigenous and local knowledge conservation initiatives. Ambio, 49(1), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01153-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free